Patient Rights - Top Ten List Of Most Violated

INTRODUCTIONabout a patient in the next room. It was
Patient rights are under siege, as evidenced in aembarrassing!"
recent survey conducted by the National InstituteCONFLICTS ABOUND
for Patient Rights (NIPR). NIPR staff compiled theConflict between "team" and patient/advocate
results based on responses from one-thousandwas the cause of #5 on The List. Patients and
randomly selected, former hospital patients whotheir advocates have a right to know of realistic
took part in the study. The results of the surveycare alternatives when hospital care is no longer
show that, despite billions spent on advances inappropriate. Some participants observed that no
medical technology, patients daily experience anone ever approached them about realistic care
erosion of their rights "at the hospital bedside."alternatives in the event that hospital care was no
Ironically, it may be a consequence of thelonger appropriate.
success of science in medicine.Not only was there no discussion of alternative
Among those responding to essay questions, thecare options, but many respondents complained
following was a typical scenario. A hospital admitsabout how they were made to feel when they
a loved one with "complications" (a medicaldisagreed with providers about the continued
euphemism for "we really don't know all that'sappropriateness of hospital care. One respondent
going on here, but there are several organsnoted, "They made us feel like we were immoral
involved"). While the loved one rests stable in bed,when we questioned their treatment
a line of doctors and nurses seems to form atrecommendations!"
the door. One after another, doctors enter theConflict was also the cause of violations #6 and
room, make a few comments, then turn around#7, violations of a right to know hospital rules on
and exit. Primary care physicians refer patients tocharges and payment methods, and a right to
specialists who rely on subspecialists. It seems likereview the hospital bill, have information explained,
each separate organ has its own special doctor.and get a copy of the bill. Said one respondent, "It
In the health care industry, this is commonlywas like pulling teeth to try to get an explanation
referred to as "component management," whichof certain charges. I still don't know why I was
results from a focus on the treatment ofcharged for things I know we didn't use."
individual organ systems in isolation from others. ItUnder violation #8, some participants complained
suffers from two shortcomings: (1) specialists andabout their inability to identify hospital personnel
subspecialists tend to segregate organ systemswho could help in resolving discrepancies over
at the expense of the whole patient; and (2) it isbilling issues or in disagreement over treatment
inefficient, because it inevitably leads to "episodicbetween "team" and patient/advocate. Patients
intervention" where if something happens, youand their advocates have a right to know of
see one specialist for a particular organ system; ifhospital resources, such as patient complaints and
something else happens, then you see anothergrievance processes, patient representatives or
specialist or subspecialist, and so on.ethics committees. It was common in the survey
Episodic intervention leads unavoidably toresults that respondents express the desire to
uncoordinated care that lacks continuity for thehave known about the hospital ethics committees
patient and for the patient's family. Many individualand their members in the event of conflict over
decisions in patient treatment by numeroustreatment options.
specialists and subspecialists entail a fragmentedMEDICAL MISTAKES AND RECORD KEEPING
delivery system. According to the findings of theAlthough listed at #9, the violation of a patient
NIPR study, this leads to the number one problemadvocate's right to know the identity and
in contemporary healthcare delivery: a failure toprofessional status of those who care for the
communicate.patient contained some of the most poignant
PIECING TOGETHER BITS OF INFORMATIONresponses in our survey results. Some of the
The study suggests health care suffers from anarrative statements were truly heartbreaking.
decided lack of coordination and cooperationMany participants claimed to have suffered some
among diverse healthcare professionals.harm as a result of medical error. Some even
Participants in the survey invariably stated that,noted if they had had ready access to
with no one to treat the entire patient andinformation about the identity and professional
coordinate care, patients and their families are leftstatus of their providers, they would have had
largely on their own to integrate their own care.second thoughts about consenting to treatment.
According to one respondent, "We had toSaid one respondent, "I am permanently disabled
somehow piece together bits of information frombecause of what a doctor did to me. I found out
different doctors to try to get a complete pictureonly much later and through my lawyer the
of our mom's progress."hospital knew the doctor caused similar problems
This can be very difficult to do in a hospitalin the past with other patients. Why didn't they
setting and extremely frustrating. Participants injust tell me?!"
the study frequently stated that no one seemedComing in at a close #10 was the violation of a
willing to tell them exactly what was going on withright to review medical records and receive an
the whole patient. Doctors were more than willingaccounting of disclosures regarding health
to share information about their specialty, aboutinformation. Participants observed that they have
precisely what was happening with their particularmoved frequently during their life times.
organ system, but no one seemed especiallyConsequently, they have received medical care
willing to say anything about how the entirefrom various providers over time. Each provider
patient was doing.keeps his or her records detailing visits and
THE TOP TEN MOST VIOLATED PATIENTtreatments. The same is true for hospitals, clinics,
RIGHTSlaboratories, pharmacies, and so on. One
This failure to communicate is responsible for theparticipant noted, "Like most people, I've moved
#1 spot on the top ten list of most violatedaround quite a bit. Over time, it's easy to forget
patient rights. A full 63% of participants felt thatwhen you were treated, by whom and even for
healthcare providers most often violated theirwhat!"
right to informed consent. When prompted toRespondents noted such problems as the wide
explain, many complained about the inadequacy ofvariation among providers in the amount of time
multiple diagnoses coming from multiple providers.they retained records, paper records were
Without a single, complete diagnosis, respondentsmisfiled or even destroyed, electronic records
felt unable to make an informed choice aboutwere lost, stolen, damaged or vulnerable to
appropriate treatment options.unauthorized access, and physicians sold their
The #2 violation on the list is related to the samepractices. Stated a respondent, "I was made to
problem. Participants often complained about thefeel intimated in asking one of my doctors for a
way in which doctors presented them withcopy of my medical records. He acted like my
treatment options. The following is amedical record was his property and his only."
representative statement, "I felt as if I was inCONCLUSION
automobile show room and the salesman wasDespite billions spent on advanced medical
presenting me with a list of options for a newtechnologies such as drugs and devices, patients
car."daily experience an erosion of their most
The #2 most violated of patient rights was a lackfundamental rights. The rights of patient
of respect for personal, spiritual, and religiousself-determination and informed consent suffer
values and beliefs. Participants observed thatthe most.
many doctors do not seem to care aboutIronically, the widespread violation of patient rights
personal preferences. Consequently, they oftenin hospital-based care may be a direct
failed to acknowledge the unique nature ofconsequence of the success of medicine,
personal lifestyles in their presentation ofspecifically of the application of science to
treatment options. To quote one respondent, "Imedicine. The scientific method lends itself to
would have liked my doctor to havereductionism with researchers analyzing smaller
recommended a treatment option tailored to myand smaller parts. Likewise in medicine, doctors
love of the outdoors. He never even asked."become specialist who confine their focus to
A failure to communicate was also the cause ofindividual organs; subspecialist focus even more
the #3 violation of patient rights, a lack of respectnarrowly on the parts of organs.
for advance directives. Participants complainedComponent management leads to episodic
vociferously about the way in which advanceintervention and the fragmentation of care. The
directives are handled by most hospitals. Statedlack of coordination causes anger and frustration
one respondent, "The only time any one everyamong patients and their families by the
mentioned my living will was at admissions. No onebreakdown in communications. A failure to
ever asked me again about my personal wishes."communicate may not just cause anger and
Miscommunication was the cause of violation #4.frustration but also unnecessary conflict. Conflict is
Despite HIPAA, many participants observed thatcostly! Miscommunications can also cause
providers often showed no regard for the privacysignificant harm when patients suffer underuse,
and confidentiality of their personal healthoveruse or misuse as a result of medical error.
information. Cell phones were often cited as theUntil hospitals adjust to the success of science in
main culprit. Said one respondent, "A nurse bentmedicine, patients and their families are likely to
over me to straighten out a line with a cell phonecontinue to experience one or more of the top
in her other hand, blurting out sensitive informationten violations of patient rights.