What Americans Are Searching For in the GF (Wheat Free) Products Compared to Australia

State of the GF Market, Report 1 - GFTECHThe first point is that Australia's population is near
report20 Million while the US is near 300 Million. Thus the
This report considers the differences in theUS is near 15 times the Australian population and
Australian and US GF markets by analysis ofyet the Australian search terms only need to be
consumer e-demand, or Google internet searches.multiplied by 10 to be very comparable. This
Basic macro economics suggests that marketssuggests that per population Australians have a
are governed by principles of supply and demand.50% more interest in searching for GF terms.
Marketing however suggests that good suppliersIt is amazing how similar the keyword groups
find where the demand is, then create andcompare for Australia and the US. While Australian
market products or services to it. It would appearand US foods and culture are similar this
that increased 'GF food' searches (over the lastshadowing of groups is phenomenal.
year) are beginning to be mirrored by increasedAlthough the 'GF foods' Group contains six
suppliers of products and services.phrases, it is easily the most commonly searched
While the GF production side of the market is wellgroup of all GF related searches in the top 20
under way in the US and Australia it still remains asearches. The major celiac phrases Group
niche market with many celiacs unaware thataccounts for only half the search volumes of 'GF
they have the disease. While Australia oftenfoods' Group volumes, however the group is only
follows US trends this article analyses thecomposed of two terms. This suggests that per
difference between the countries regarding searchphrase, in both Australia and the US, there are is
habits and therefore demand for GF products andan almost equal interest in people seeking
services.information on 'GF foods' as there are searching
Firstly there is obviously a difference in the spellingfor information on the disease.
of the disease in each country. Australia spells itBy comparison, there is an overall relatively low
as 'coeliac', while the US use 'celiac'. During thisinterest in 'gluten diet' grouping and 'GF recipe'
research it was found that while most Australian'sgroup, as judge by how few deviations of the
use the coeliac spelling a large number still use theterms exist. However the three Australian 'GF
American version. Americans only search for therecipe' terms cluster together in the top ten of
US spelling.searches and nearer the top of the searches
While Australians look for products that are glutencompared to the US terms. Both of these groups
and 'gluten dairy free', the US does not associatecould be considered as a niche area and subgroup
the two.of what people would find by using the search
In both countries people search for topics such asterms in the large 'GF food' group anyway.
'gluten recipes'. While this logically may not seemThe 'wheat free' group is composed of four
like they are searching for 'GF recipes', GF recipeterms. Two of the terms are substitutes for 'GF
sites dominate the search results confirming thatfood' terms, and two are based on allergy related
this is a 'learned shortcut' that people are using.issues. This shows that most people prefer
The top 20 or so terms (excluding spellingsearching directly for 'GF foods' rather than
differences) searched for by both countries is'wheat free'. Also for issues relating to the
very similar. As individual terms will vary fromdisease, most people still search for information
month to month it is less instructive to compareon celiacs rather than wheat intolerance.
individual terms rather than GROUP terms. For thisFor November the total Google searches for the
reason the top search terms are group in themain 'GF food' related terms was 316,000 in
following manner:Australia compared to a little over 3 million in the
- GF foods = 6US. Again this is a factor of 10 whereas the US is
- Gluten diet = 2nearer 15 times more populous than Australia.
- GF recipes = 3If the population of the US is considered to be
- Coeliac related = 2approximately 300 Million, and 1 in 100 people are
- Wheat free related = 4celiac. That would mean that on average there is
Group Composition:one GF term searched for every celiac in the US.
GF Foods: This group of search terms all involveIn Australia a population of 20 Million would mean
the word GF and is to do with phrases withthat about 1.6 searches per celiac.
respect to GF foods.Research suggests that different races have
Gluten Diet: These are terms that are related todifference susceptibilities to acquiring the disease,
the specifics of GF diets.which in the US would reduce the overall rate of
GF recipe: Searches and website related toCD to 1 in 133. Even if this is so, CD typically has
cooking GF meals.very low rates of diagnosis. In fact from a recent
Coeliac related: For Australia, there four termsGF show in Melbourne, it appeared that there
considered: two each for the coeliac / celiacmay be as many people who are gluten intolerant
spellings. In the US while the same two terms areor just choose GF for health reasons as there are
compared (celiac spelling only), a third celiacdiagnosed people with CD.
related term is included in the total volumes.Google says that for 'Food and Drink' sites, a
Except for the specific term 'GF', the coeliacbenchmark rate of New Visitors is 71% of all
related terms have by far the highest searchvisits. From observations and these facts it would
volumes.appear that only a small amount of celiacs and
Wheat free group: For both Australia and the USgluten intolerant people are searching for
these terms all fall outside of the top ten searchinformation on GF food but that they do it
volumes for gluten related terms.reasonably regularly per month.
Analysis of Search Volumes